Watching one of the 24-7 news channels and a pundit 'sagely' opined how a civil war in Iraq might affect President Bush's approval ratings.
If there's a difference between partisan politics and voodoo, please feel free to attempt to make the distinction.
On the other hand, two can play at the wild-speculation-based-on-no-facts game.
Former Serbian leader Milosevic just attempted to call Clinton and Blair to the stand as defense witnesses. Then he suddenly dies in captivity.
It's becoming increasingly obvious the "facts" we were sold in the lead-up to NATO action were, at a minimum, exaggerated. Unlike the many conpiracy theories with no evidence in support, a conspiracy of like-minded internationalists is easy to prove: Clinton, Soros, Heinz, the UN, CFR, the EU, MSM, NGO's, etc.
How, well, convenient that Milosevic was never allowed to present a defense by cross-examining his accusers in politics.
You can hear it coming...
"WHO BENEFITS" from the death of Milosevic?
/Proof? Since when has Justin Raimondo asked for proof? My standards for rumor-mongering are well-established in precedent.
The Grim Milestone of Blogs "I find the language and rhetoric coming from America too confrontational" - Prince Charles "Nuts" - Gen McAuliffe America: Saving idiots from themselves since WWI